Election Night's slow downloads

Analysis/Commentary

Election Night was particularly painful this campaign season due to slow download times and a paucity of the latest and greatest information. Television showcased the same old, tired talking heads, while Web news lacked a timeliness -- a "this is now" kind of conviction.

Apparently, the television networks stumbled when they first "gave" Florida to Gore -- based on exit polls -- then recanted. And the Web churned slowly, in silence, reveling in its shadow existence.

There was a good side and a bad to Net reports:

  • CNN provided an Electoral Vote counter, and its cover page was loaded with timely information.

  • The New York Times gave readers a tongue-in-cheek summary of what the anchors on the major television stations were doing and saying.

  • Yahoo!'s Election Coverage site braced itself for an audience that would surpass the Victoria's Secret fashion show -- and delivered flawlessly. ("Yahoo!" is right.)

On the down side:

  • Voter.com consistently crashed. Was it overloaded or just badly coded?

  • Many news stories neglected to prominently display their date lines, so visitors couldn't help reading old news as new news.

  • CNN hosted a "news analyst chat" that played it safe by focusing entirely on Mrs. Clinton's victory over Mr. Lazio. Boring.

All told, Election Night was one slow download -- which, you must admit, hardly becomes an electronic medium. Clicksville snored.

The big ticket item when last I looked? Bush had turned in for night. Could anyone blame him?

November 8, 2000